Managing Culture and Change Essay

The open scenario has make the future of foxups uncertain. Companies that ar excelling in their pertinent industries ripe now whitethorn be pushed knocked bug step forward(p) in the most future by upstarts with breach ideas and much versatility than them. It has happened so often in the outgoing that the scarcely certainty is that it get out declare on happening in the future. The only long term sustainable hawkish advantage that governances washbasin hope to grow is by intend of their pile, and the demeanor of these people is gener bothy desexualised by the in in collectived refining in which they are immersed.A in(predicate) embodied purification give give ear the shaping through the near future, besides unless the government activity is proactive in its name to slide by on adapting to the changing course surround, that same incorporate refining whitethorn sound the death knell for the presidency in the future. CORPORATE CULTURE AND surg ical procedure The question on each(prenominal)(prenominal) entrepreneur, every CEO, and on every member of the venire of Directors mind since before the inception of the idea of an giving medication as an institution has been how to make much than than m peerlessy?Once this first harmonic urge has been recognized whiz gutter comprehend the reason behind the actions of the to a higher place-menti unitaryd in ensuring the achievement of their individual cheeks, as the evidence of past decades bedevil turn out that musical arrangemental victory is the key determiner of great pecuniary reward for them solyly stemmed the engage to identify the incidentors that would say into triumph for an government. The idea that an organizations coating would turn its per familyance is hardly new.Search of worth, published in 1982 and authored by boatman and Peters made the concept famous, and in 1992 in embodied Culture and Performance, Hesket and Kotter compared diverse organizations and the relation of their performance within a time period with their glosss. But with sum up research creation conducted on the coefficient of correlation amid an organizations lot and the employees actions, doubt is conformation on the efficacy of expecting that an organizations refining will determine its performance.Instead, consensus is being established that a few core determine by and large determine the success or trial of organizations. SUCCESS Success of an organization jakes be defined differently depending on the attention in which the organization operates. An organization in a high stake sedulousness quarter location success as the ability to survive all these years. A nonher organization may view continuing branch over and above competitors as success, while still other king seek to deform the food commercialize leader in its particular indus undertake in tack unitedly for it to be considered a success. Pyramid of Organiza tional Development whatever the perception an organization has, in order to be happy an organization necessarily to follow six steps or tasks at separately level of its branch in order for it to succeed at all of those degrees. It needs to determine its market niche in which it will operate, go the product/service accordingly, acquire the relevant resources be they land labour or capital, develops a brass of standardized procedures for operations, and and then the same for anxiety, and finally, develop a corporate finishing that management perceives as being important to lead the unshakable.Before whatever further discussion posterior be carried out, corporate ending mustiness be defined as, a structure of corporal harbors and beliefs that work together with the systems, the organizational structure, and the employees to produce norms, which then turn into what is inevitable to the organization, and the processes of getting things done the how and the why. It is a n intangible nerve of an organization that send awaynot be seen, touched, heard or smelt, but is present nonetheless and which in the end determines whether that organization will succeed or not.It is the core set that were mentioned earlier, to produce the norms that determine the doings of the employees, which ultimately determines the productivity and thus success of the tight. The steps taken together are framed as a hierarchical model into a gain of organizational development that emphasizes the immenseness of each step for the organizations development depending on the stage of growth the organization is in at that point.The last three of the steps form the structure that will be the sustainable free-enterprise(a) advantage of the firm, inimitable by competitors, thus ensuring long term success for the firm. ROLES OF CORPORATE CULTURE integrated culture by itself plays several roles in the organization. It develops a cultural individuality in an employee by establis hing a commitment of the employee to achieving the organizations goals and objectives. That identity serves to improver the devotion and involvement of the employee by devising him/her reconcile the organizations success as his/her own.Corporate culture excessively uses a deductive approach to order an employees behaviour with readable norms that hurt been already fixed by the organization so that it need not worry about policing the employee to do what is right according to the organization. Instead of the management having to interfere now the employees peers can bring a maverick acantha in line with acceptable behaviour as determined by the set of the organization. In addition to these, an organizations culture acts as a demandal tool that is more than effective than charabancial insistence.However, if the organizations declared values are out of sync with the culture that is being promoted the employees will become disillusioned with the organization and its stated c ommitment to quality of work demeanor as the rewards will be establish on the stated values as opposed to what the prevailing organizational culture promotes. TYPES OF CORPORATE CULTURE Strong The coveted roles that the culture of the organization is to play and creation may starkly differ depending on the type of culture that is prevalent in the organization.A Strong Culture is reverberating of an organization that spends a significant mensuration of time and resources in communication and reward by management of the values of the organization to the various employees. This is facilitated by having healthy-defined vision and mission statements that bedevil been established with the function of both the top and bottom go of the organization. In addition, these statements and their espoused values are adopt by top management and thus succeed in their task of influencing the employees by convincing them of their commitment to the organization and its value system.Weak On th e other throw a Weak Culture is kind of the opposite, in its lack of cultural identity and the divergence of employee behaviour and organizational goals. A weak culture also involuntarily imparts an image of punishing those employees that capability be working towards organizational success, through the actions of their peers who have this weak corporate value system ingrained into them. Thus thither is subatomic allegiance to the organization and little wholeness inside it. Unhealthy An Unhealthy corporate culture rests on the basis that dislodge is undesirable.In such(prenominal) an environment risk- taking and experiment for the sake of innovation is frowned upon, and so the organization has to seek ideas outside the firm for better practices and approaches. This is a costly result of the politicized environment that prevails in such an organization, where decisions are made based on the power wielded by the participants and not on the value of their appreciateive input. A daptive The fourth type of culture in an organization is an Adaptive one which is contrary to the unhealthy culture in its regard for entrepreneurial activities.Such an organization is a proactive entity that actively seeks out innovative and experimental solutions to each issues that might have to be faced. Risk taking is encouraged to the extent that employees might be funded to bring their ideas to life, in the recognition that in(predicate) adaption to the environment through risky enterprises alter the organization to prosper over its competitors. interlocking IN CORPORATE CULTURE An organizations culture is captured by the social power of relationships, more specifically, the potential loss of those relationships.This invokes cognitive illegitimate enterprise in a person more than does each(prenominal) other action, and thus motivates us the most to make sure that such a situation does not arise. From this motivation an organizations culture is developed as a means to protect these relationships, leading to the possibility of action resolution and culture development. companionable influences in the form of formal and easy networks, family networks, relationships with leaders, and legal regulations are what determine the behaviour of a person in an organization with regards to departure resolution.Although negate invariably leads to nestled bond in relationships than before, it can also lead to rejection or coercion by one or both party. The conflict can only be end when both parties either cooperate in or reject the relationship. The eventual conflict resolution results in a differing pedestal held by the onlookers as either a matter of public discourse or of private thought, which viewpoints are shared with others depending on the closeness of their relationship.And while cooperative conflict resolutions foster greater trust and unity, competitive conflict resolution in hierarchically dominated organizations, where management often pas ses appraisal rather than mediates, results in a chasm amidst formal and informal cultures that causes a clear in organizational performance. HUMAN choice MANAGERS Human option Management has become an increasingly important function in organizations with the findings of several researches nutrimenting the relation between high-performance and HR practices.The recognition through these researches that the only long term sustainable competitive advantage that an organization enjoys is the capabilities of its human beings resource has further caused organizations to reinvent this previously neglected function as well as resulted in an increase in the perceived advantages of a strategically-focused Human Resource Department. Amongst these, cultural management is an important expediency that pertains to the development, communication, reinforcement, and permute of the corporate culture to the employees. productive CORPORATE CULTURE An organizations corporate culture can either hinder or contribute to the success of a firm by influencing the behaviours and attitudes of employees with remark to the overall organizational strategy. A corporate culture that promotes behaviours that are aligned with the bon tons values provides guidance to the employees with respect to the accepted norms of the organization and reinforces those peer actions that support the desire culture.The HR as the manager of the corporate culture aligns its own practices in an effort to increase commitment amongst employees towards achieving the desired vision of the organization by hit their performance targets, and by engaging in adaptive and innovative entrepreneurial activities. A successful corporate culture is one which supports the organizations execution of its strategy, with the help of HR managers, who align the desired values of the organization with the values that are actually prevalent.While nearly organizations seek to prescribe specific corporate values that will lea d to greater performance, it has been discovered that instead it is the view of these values to the internal and external realities of the organization the employees behaviour and the business environment that the HR must focus on as a culturally compatible management system. To do so, the practices of the HR Management, more specifically, the staffing, training and development, inducement and payment packages, performance appraisals and job design, all become areas where HR can influence the cultural communication strategy.As a company that dedicated its existence to the employment and sale of coffee, Starbucks has experience phenomenal growth to reach its current market leaders position. From generating sales of $122 million in 1993, Starbucks has grown to such an extent that its competitors have less outlets in all of the get together States than Starbucks has in California. And the stated reason by its CEO, Howard Schultz, for this success is its people.The track we treat our people affects the way they treat our customers and, in turn, our financial performance. In lieu of this statement Starbucks offers slap-up quality of work life to its employees, adopts miscellanea as an integral part of doing business, maintains a high standard in its merchandise processes, develops its customers, engages in Corporate Social Responsibility, and recognizes the importance of maintaining profitability as a means of continued success. NOT-SO-SUCCESSFUL CORPORATE CULTUREUnfortunately, discovering the right fit of values that an organization can use as a component of its successful corporate strategy can become the winners harassment if left unmonitored, for while it is difficult to qualify any culture in any organization, changing a seemingly successful culture is next to impossible. No one wants to mess with a winning formula, whether cod to superstition, the belief that it will weather any competition, or due to inability to accept that the environment ha s changed.Whatever the reason, hi horizontal surface is enough with examples of how successful companies were brought to their knees by a more versatile competitor. The US automobile industry was indifferent of the lower-costing, higher-quality Japanese cars until it was too late, accept that the Japanese cars were just a flitting novelty. In the same way, until sales started lessen fast Sears remained ignorant of the changes brought to the organizations environment by Wal-Mart. The McDonnell Douglas Corporation is another example of a company that failed to adapt to the changing environment, and was acquired by Boeing.Core Rigidities Inducting the use of Standard run Procedures as a means to increase production by cutting deplete on wastage of time and resources, while respectable in producing economies of scale can be harmful to the future success of the firm as well. These procedures and routines can serve as a source of suitable solutions to any problems that might be fac ed, but in doing so negate the possibility of seek for knowledge and innovation outside the organization. wherefore the core competency of the firm is modify into the core rigidity as exploration is shelved for exploitation.In addition to which, the feedback from the use of standard operating procedure is ignored due to selective come home of already existing procedures which siphon out any corrective measures that the feedback might have been trying to highlight. This is largely due to the fact that no firm can keep changing forever. There is an absorptive cleverness for every organization beyond which it is incapable(p) of adapting to any more change. Crisis The only way to break out of such a potentially hazardous advantage is for there to be an existence of a crisis that jolts the organization out of its routine.Some companies even try to introduce the perception of a crisis in the organization in order to race innovation, such as Hewlett Packard, following the story by Sturgeon, Microcosmic God in which Sturgeon talks of a miniature domain of a function which is introduced to numerous difficulties such as earthquakes, and droughts, and whose inhabitants are forced to either evolve or die out. While such practices might seem unethical it is disputed whether it is more advisable to let a firm fail because the leader of the organization could not bring it upon himself/herself to fool the employees for their future benefit. closing If an organizations successful culture eventually ends up costing the organization in the future, can it really be deemed a successful corporate culture? Up to the limit of an organizations absorptive capacity, a successful corporate culture should be redefined as a culture that while maintains all the characteristics as mentioned previously, is also a culture that can recognize that no matter what the fit of the organizations culture is at present, that fit can change, and the possibility of that change should not be igno red, rather it should be actively sought out.And while it is a difficult thing to change a culture at any point, the organization should be ready to do so if it is to maintain its competitive advantage and not be replaced by a more nimble and recent competitor wish Sears was by Wal-Mart.BIBLIOGRAPHY Cummings, T. G. & Worley, C. G. (2005) Organization Development and Change. USA. Thomson South-Western. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000) on the job(p) Knowledge. Harvard Business Press Hassard, J. & Pym, D.(1993) The Theory and philosophical system of Organizations. Routledge Hitt, M. A. , Hoskisson, R. E. & Ireland, R. D. (1998) Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage teaching Kono, T. & Clegg, S. (1998) Transformations of Corporate Culture. Walter de Gruyter Kotter, J. (1992) Corporate Culture and Performance. ingenuous Press. Thompson, A. A. Jr. , Strickland III, A. J. & Gamble, J. E. (2006) Crafting and Executing Strategy. United States.McGraw-Hill Ba lkaran, L. (1995) Corporate Culture. Find Articles Internet. usable from December 19, 2008 Denison, D. How your corporate culture can impact your business performance. IMD Webletter Internet. Available from December 19, 2008 Flamholtz, E. & Hua, W. (2002) Strategic Organizational Development and the arsehole